My Life.Happenings and Thoughts
About this Entry
Posted by: RabidPopTart

Visit RabidPopTart's Xanga Site

Original: 3/27/2007 6:26 PM
Views: 4
Comments: 1
eProps: 2

Read Comments
Post a Comment
Back to Your Xanga Site


Who gave the eProps?
2 eProps!2 eProps! 2 eProps from:
tigrrrswim04

Tuesday, March 27, 2007

An examination of truth, part 3.

 
Currently Listening
A Greater Song
By Paul Baloche
I Will Boast
see related
So, the foundation is laid. Absolute truth exists.

Now, where does it come from?

A metaphor.

This is an interesting thing to consider. Let's start with something simple, like the rules of football. Within the realm of the National Football League, the rules of football are absolute. If an offensive lineman moves before the snap, he is in the wrong. If Terell Owens celebrates excessively, he is in the wrong. Now, how the referees view these rules and call them doesn't affect the absolute nature of the rules. They're still absolute, even if the refs make a dumb call. Football rules have changed over time, too.

But what makes them absolute?

Well, the powers that be - the commissioners, the owners, maybe the coaches...not sure, but definitely people in authority get to make and modify rules. So why is grabbing someone's face mask illegal? Because the authorities declared that to be a bad thing. Now, it's just logical to us. I doubt you'll find very many people who would say that players should be able to tackle people by their face masks (Even though it used to be legal!) It's interesting, isn't it, that when rules are set, they become so commonplace that the majority can't imagine the sport without them! (Changing the touchdown from siz points to 8? Yeah right!)

So basically, they're absolute because people higher than the sport and in control of the sport say so.

Universal morality?

Now, let's bring it back to morality. We have these rules in life. Yeah, you can say murdering is wrong because the government says so, but at some point the founding fathers had to write that law based on their own ideas about the moral right and wrong-ness of killing someone else. Besides, there is no culture that looks upon murderers as heros. Perhaps people who kill people from other tribes and other cultures, but I challenge you to name me one culture where people think it is noble and right to kill good people within the culture, or steal from them, etc. In what culture is theft seen as a good thing? What about lying? Sure, in America being dishonest is so common, but no one ever is glorified for dishonesty; in fact, what I've found is that politicians can get skewered or even impeached for telling a lie.

All I'm trying to say is that there are universal morals, even though we don't always adhere to them. For more information on this concept, read "Mere Christianity" by C.S. Lewis. Also, this link (click here) does a good job with some basic responses to moral relativism and arguments supporting absolutism.

The tie-back to the metaphor.

If you're still with me, then we agree that there is such a thing as absolute morality. Morality that transcends culture. So then, who makes the rules?

Football players do not make the rules of football; rather, it is the higher authorities who do so.

Human beings do not make the rules of life; rather, it is a higher authority who does so.

What authority is higher than humanity?

God.

In the next post, we'll look at what God has to say about truth.
 Posted 3/27/2007 6:26 PM - 4 Views - 2 eProps - 1 Comment

Give eProps or Post a Comment

1 Comment

Visit tigrrrswim04's Xanga Site!
i'm reading back over this series, and i realized something. in this (awesome!) argument against moral relativism, you make the jump to pointing to God as the "higher authority that makes the rules"... and while i'm totally in line with this, what about those who aren't? what about the atheists and agnostics, the muslims who equate God with allah, the hindus and animists who have multiple gods each endowed with specific purposes and abilities?

what i'm saying is:
#1 establish God as the true God, the God of Abraham, Moses, and David, the God of the Bible.
#2 perhaps some sort of separate argument needs to be thrown in here to say Who God is and *why* He is that Highest Authority.

i dunno, maybe the two should be kept as separate dissertations.. and of course most faith concepts are linked.. but that's just my two cents at the moment.

~Lara
Posted 9/3/2007 10:22 PM by tigrrrswim04 - reply


Choose Identity
(?)
 
Give eProps (?)
Post a Comment
Add Link | Preview HTML comment help 
Profile Pic:
Default  |  Choose »  (?)



Back to RabidPopTart's Xanga Site!
Note: your comment will appear in RabidPopTart's local time zone:
GMT -05:00 (Eastern Standard - US, Canada)